On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Morgan Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since an additional repository would have to be used to get this on > lenny, it's probably best to not ship Sugar 0.81 at all unless you can > get an exception to get 0.82.x included. There would be frustration > for those who try to use Sugar out of the box without upgrading to > 0.82.
+1 Marco _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep