On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Morgan Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since an additional repository would have to be used to get this on
> lenny, it's probably best to not ship Sugar 0.81 at all unless you can
> get an exception to get 0.82.x included. There would be frustration
> for those who try to use Sugar out of the box without upgrading to
> 0.82.

+1

Marco
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to