Greg Smith wrote: > Hi Simon and Marco, > > I have you lined up for a discussion on Monday afternoon January 12 as well: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XOCamp_2#Monday_January_12.2C_2009
I am sorry, but I can not make the XOCamp. But I think Marco does. I saw you attend the FUDCon, so we I am happy to answer questions personally there as well. In general, I have been giving a lots of thoughts to the Sugar Labs BugSquad (e.g. what additions we need in trac and the general workflow http://sugarlabs.org/go/BugSquad/StatusFields). At the moment I am waiting a bit on people returning after christmas and new year to set things in stone :) Thanks, Simon > I put a few lines of agenda here: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XOCamp_2#Sugar_Synch_Up > > Fill that in with more detail as you have it. Anything you can post in > advance will help be more productive. I can put something together on > process (e.g. where do we file bugs, how do we triage them and get them > resolved) unless you want to do that. > > You can also put your name on the list of people coming here: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XOCamp_2#Attendees > > Thanks, > > Greg S > >> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:05:29 +0100 >> From: Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> >> Subject: Re: [IAEP] FUDcon + XOCamp talks >> To: Marco Pesenti Gritti <marc...@sugarlabs.org> >> Cc: iaep <iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org> >> Message-ID: <495a0e89.7070...@schampijer.de> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> so we are going to be officially present at FUDcon and I assume some >>> of us will also stay for XOCamp. Is anyone planning to give talks? >>> Here is what I have in mind. I think Simon also had something. >>> >>> FUDcon: >>> >>> * Discussion about packaging activities. xo vs rpm, how do solve >>> maintenance problems etc. >> +1 I think this is a very important one - and it fits very well into FUDCon. >> >>> * Newbie oriented "class" about hacking on Sugar and activities. >> Hmm, as much as I like this idea, I wonder how much interest we will >> exactly find at FUDCon. Or if there are other distribution specific >> challenges we could solve in during that conference. In any case it >> might be a good way to generate the class material. >> >> My additional point would be: >> * Sugar - How to get involved? >> - Packaging >> - Testing: How the Fedora Testing team and the Sugar Labs BugSquad can >> work together, try to get a discussion on how the work flow with the >> GNOME BugSquad is. >> - ? (if i missed something) >> >> Best, >> Simon >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) >> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep >> >> End of IAEP Digest, Vol 9, Issue 89 >> *********************************** >> > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep