On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:27:44AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Jameson Quinn <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Would it be reasonable to ask for logs to be only half-heartedly public?
Contention: nobody interested in comprehending the logs will not have (or be granted) a shell account from which they can just run irssi and take care of the logging themselves. I don't think the audience might understand the volume, verbosity, and context-mining involved in browsing such a log. Logging -1 (though nobody's asked for a vote, nor might I be able to; for those who don't know what +1, -0, etc. mean, see: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for an explanation, and see: http://kernelslacker.livejournal.com/125203.html for why you shouldn't do it (do as I say...). Martin
pgpkZGMUzxvAG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
