> [age-related replacements for "users"] -1
Why limit ourselves? > ["Learner" as a replacement for "users"] +0 I can't see any developer using this term easily[1]. Call the people who use a Sugar activity to learn/do/communicate either: People[a] who use[b] a Sugar activity to learn[c]/communicate/etc. a. People b. Users c. Learn/communicate/etc. -ers. Note how hard it is to simplifly that sentence but keep the "activity" noun, and eliminating that loses something. Martin 1. Smacks of a small community trying to re-invent the universe of discourse of two huge communities (educators, computer science). I think that's what we're trying to do, but should we do _that_ part of it _now_?
pgpYoQKf0tIih.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
