Tomeu Vizoso schrieb: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 03:39, Raul Gutierrez Segales<r...@rieder.net.py> > wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 15:06 -0400, Walter Bender wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Van Assche<dvanass...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> Or are you saying the feedback is getting through and I'm just not seeing >>>> it? >>> We all seem to agree that feedback is important. >>> >>> We mostly agree that there is value in feedback from all deployments, >>> big and small. >>> >>> We are currently getting valuable feedback from the field: Sur, the >>> Ceibal blogs, reports from Nepal, Greg's reports from GPA, et al. >>> >>> We need more feedback and therefore we are exploring additional means >>> of getting it. You ideas are welcome! >>> >> Perhaps a section in Sugar Digest with links to highlights of what went >> on in deployments during the week? > > Sounds like a great idea to me.
Yes, this is indeed a great idea! >> Wearing a deployer-hat I must confess that we could (Paraguayan >> Deployment Team) do a better job filing tickets, giving feedback, etc. >> >> Will try to keep discipline from now on :-) > > This will be great. Also, what if each deployment lists somewhere > (wiki?) the 10 bugs that would need fixed first and the 10 new > features that need most? Definitely worth a shot. > That way a volunteer developer would be able to relate his work to > something actually useful somewhere else, as opposed to something that > _he_ just thought was a good idea. I think this could be a powerful > motivator to get more people involved. My thoughts exactly... :-) Christoph -- Christoph Derndorfer co-editor, olpcnews url: www.olpcnews.com e-mail: christ...@olpcnews.com _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep