On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 05:56:34PM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Got the followed notification from ASLO, so the question I have in > mind - should ASLO editor be guided only technical questions during > pushing activities to the public(in all previous cases it was so).
Non-technical editorial power, once exercised, will set expectations / precedence / obligations (in some jurisdictions) that I only understand to the extent that I hope I never have to pay a lawyer to understand. I don't think we're going to want to make these decisions. Are we going to say no to a Bible-reading activity? Wikinomicon slice? A wikipedia slice with pictures of Mohammed? One containing articles critical of governments? Etc. If a response in the form of a proposal is useful: Leave it open technically so someone can make kidsactivities.theirdomain.biz and similar, but otherwise exercise no non-technical editorial control. And never raise the question again. Martin
pgpmrbSPAdnXy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
