On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The problem with this approach is that it renders SoaS ineffective for >> new tryers of Sugar (i.e. the overwhelming majority of teachers and >> parents we are trying to reach). > > I don't think it will be any less ineffective than having 20 > activities of which half have issues, crash or just don't run.
Are people saying _only 6 activities work reliably?_ My question of "which is it?" was assuming there are more than 6 that run well, demo well, maintained, etc. So it meant "which plan is it, 6 activities that allow downloading and installing of more, or the good ones?" If there are only 6 good ones... would focus on making that list longer. Did APIs break with Sugar churn, Fedora churn? Developers upload without testing? (Rethorical! Flamefest warning! Those questions are bound to be a flamefest blaming people who don't deserve to be blamed... :-( ) cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep