On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:53:22AM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote: > > The article probably also fails to mention that peer-reviewed > scientific tests of this concept prove it to be useless. > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2906666
I disagree. Those tests were of 20-70 kHz, not 45-67 Hz. I've found no peer-reviewed tests of low frequency sound, but then I don't know where to look. Got any ideas? (I do see another study on NIH showing high frequency sound induced increased biting rates ... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618651 ) -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep