Martin Sorry, compatibility not transition.
Tony > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:21:26AM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > Thanks to everybody who has contributed to the discussion so far, > > particularly to Sean for his well researched post on Android > > developments. > > > > The choices as I understand: > > 0) Do not have an Android transition plan > > I read the SLOBS minutes of 2013-01-14 [1] as not agreeing to a > "transition" plan but a "compatibility" plan. This is a huge > distinction. If I have misunderstood, it'd be interesting to know > where the "transition" or similar language is minuted. > > The minutes indicate that no detailed plan has been agreed; there is > no information about what technically is planned, just what technical > directions are possible[2] > > > Tony > > Martin > > 1. http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2013-01-14 > 2. > http://www.google-melange.com/gci/work/download/google/gci2012/7972209?id=17001 > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
