>> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18. > > Please elaborate :) > > I think developing web activities on two very different platforms (WebKit1 > and WebKit2) is a bad idea, it will involve more work (and pain) then doing > some backporting.
Well, with a little patch in our F18 rpm, I have all the web activities working ok in webkit1. A important missing feature is the web inspector, but they work ok. I was looking at compile the webkit rpm from F19 in F18, but had many dependencies. I didn't explore other alternatives. > >> >> In the long term, >> we need find a solution to move to a newer Fedora in the XOs, maybe 20 or >> 21. > > > Yes, ideally. I just don't see this happening in the short time and I'm > worried it might not happen at all, given the kind of work that seems to be > involved. It would be awesome to be proven wrong... > > Until that happens though I think we need to be able to get the latest sugar > (and it's dependencies) on a XO. > Agreed, not easy, but needed in the long run. IN fact other of your proposals, like use wayland will need it Gonzalo _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep