I added a Needs Design field to the status. -walter
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 9 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard <godi...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> This is an interesting blog post with a paragraph about GNOME triaging >>> >>> http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/2014/04/09/enabling-participation/ >>> >>> Interestingly it's pretty much exactly the same approach I followed with >>> the triaging I had done with 0.100. It would be good to have a simple set of >>> rule like that written down before the meeting. I think the way we triage >>> has a huge impact on lowering contribution barriers, >>> >> >> +1 >> >> We need at least verify all the "Unconfirmed" tickets. We can start now, >> don't need wait until the triage meeting. >> I assume, if the bug is confirmed, we should set: >> Milestone = 0.102 >> Status = New > > > I wonder about Milestone. It seems like it would only be useful if we assign > different milestones to tickets and I'm not sure we can do that without > being able to allocate resources to fix them. It's also a time consuming > task. > >> >> or close them if are not longer present. >> >> Would be good if we can reset all the priorities to "Unassigned", >> in all the tickets with module=Sugar,the field content does not have any >> sense right now. > > > Do we want to use the field? Otherwise maybe there is a way to just get rid > of it. > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep