I don't will reply about your interpretation of our communication, looks like will not change with anything I can say.
We are trying to make something different this time, we started a survey already sent to people responsible on deployments, to get more information, and we are organizing a face to face meeting with all the members fro SLOBs, to discuss strategies. We are discussing more ideas, like survey the community and teachers, like was proposed in this list. Gonzalo PS: To people involved in deploying Sugar (on XOs or other hardware), if are interested in participate, and didn't received the survey yet, send me a email. On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Dan Tenason <dan.tena...@mail.ru> wrote: > > As part of my research, I reviewed iaep since the inception of the > project. This same general discussion comes up over and over. A long term > supporter of the project expresses concern over the future of the project. > Dr Bender replies with a Sugar Digest post that everything is perfect. At > that point Dr Bender marginalizes the provocateur personally and > professional. A few weeks later Dr. Bender will send another Sugar Digest > that he has discussed the situation with the board. They will have decided > that the current path is best. > > This is a very effective strategy if people are clamoring to join the > project. What will happen this time? > > -- > Dan Tenason > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Software for children learning
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
