Hi Caryl! Sorry to hear about that - best wishes for you and Ed that it all goes smoothly! :)
On 5 May 2016 at 12:14, Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi all... > I finally had a chance to check out the discussions about the motions I > have proposed. Unfortunately I don't really have the chance to do much > commenting as I am restricted to communicating with my I phone for a while. > > After a great 10 days in WA and going to LinuxFestNW (on our own dime), we > got home and Ed started having dizzy spells. After a lot of testing, it has > been decided that the time to get a pacemaker has come. So, if all goes > according to plan, it will be implanted this evening and he will get to go > home about 24 hours later. > > That means I will miss tomorrow's meeting. If I need to add anything to > the motion or discussion before it comes up for vote... Send an email to > this thread. > > Caryl > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 3, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > > On 3 May 2016 at 09:37, Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Why does the vision statement say "but not phones"? I run Sugarizer on my >> iPhone and Ed's Android phone. There are some formatting issues but they >> are easily overcome. In the real world of developing countries, children >> are probably more likely to have access to one of these tiny screens than >> any tablet or computer. They deserve access to Sugar too. > > > I added that because when I tested it seemed to not work well, but I don't > object to removing it and have just done so :) > > > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Vision_proposal_2016&diff=98338&oldid=98337 > > -- Cheers Dave
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep