On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: > > ... > >> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservancy (for >> legal/financial/administrative service) is equal to 10% of all expenditures >> (outlays) each fiscal year, i.e. March 1st to end of February. >> >> (But someone else can correct me if I'm wrong!) > > I think you are wrong, but I am still looking for the proof. It is my > understanding that SFC takes 10% of incoming donations only, not a 10% > cut of all transactions (inbound and outbound). > > That is what is described in their template Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement. > > http://sfconservancy.org/docs/sponsorship-agreement-template.pdf > > "Fees. > The FIXME-SIGNATORIES agree to donate ten percent (10%) of the > Project's gross revenue (including, but not necessarily limited to, > all income and donations) to Conservancy for its general operations." > > I'm looking for an executed copy of the current SugarLabs-SFC FSA to > confirm, unfortunately the wiki version looks at variance with the > template, but as a wiki page, it has no "official" status. > > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/SFC_Fiscal_Agreement > > cjl
Adam, As SFC contact, could you please confirm that this 2012 version of the Amended FSA is the currently effective agreement? Note, it shows the 10% cut of revenue, no transaction fees. cjl
AmendedFSASugar.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
