Hi On 2 June 2016 at 11:59, Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I think most motions are dealt with at SLOB meetings. That is why there is > such a "log jam." Often motions are made more or less "off the cuff" and > need a lot of revision before they can be voted on. But meeting time is used > up discussing them anyway.
Hmm. I see in https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2016-03-04#Voting_By_Laws that all motions posted via email __MUST__ be passed within 168 hours (1 week) or they automatically fail and are not eligible for voting on at the follow SLOB meeting unless they have been explicitly resubmitted. > The motions in the pdf are essentially the same as the ones posted before in > the doc. The only major change was to go back to $Y as the amount for > incidental expenses, thus allowing the SLOB to set the amount now and change > it easily as needed. This follows the example (Walter's or your idea?) of > setting the FM's compensation initially at $0 with the ability of the SLOB > to change it as needed. Okay - I will submit a motion setting the price :) > Your motions are on the agenda so I assume you will see them tomorrow. I am glad they are, although I don't think they should be, per the above they have failed and need to be resubmitted :) -- Cheers Dave _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep