On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
> Hi > > I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of > SLOB. > > On 4 June 2016 at 11:38, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> > wrote: > >> If I was a SLOB I would support this motion. The passivity of the SLOBs >> is disappointing. It is better to vote and fail, than to linger. >> >> El 03/06/16 a las 16:10, Dave Crossland escribió: >> >> Motion: to agree the following procedure for all future monthly SLOB >> meetings: the chair will confirm the meeting meets quorum; the chair will >> make any announcements submitted to them before the meeting; the chair will >> announce the first motion pending a vote on that day; each present SLOB >> member will announce their vote; the chair will announce the outcome of the >> motion; the chair will announce the next motion, until all motions are >> voted on; the chair will invite everyone attending to an open discussion of >> any topic until the meeting ends at the time scheduled. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop >> project!)IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep >> >> >> > > > -- > Cheers > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > SLOBs mailing list > sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs > > While I appreciate that such a mechanism might be useful in cleaning the pipes, I think that we really want to take advantage of the meetings for discussions. It was my hope that discussion about motions could be largely held before hand and discussion of ideas held at the meeting. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
