On 21 June 2016 at 11:56, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > an agreed upon partnership placed under publication embargo. SL wouldn't > likely need to embargo, but a partner might wish to. This PR-smart approach > has been transformed by the Internet and social media these past few years, > but
Similarly, what does that have to do with public motions? If the board wants to act in private, they don't need to vote on public motions to do so. _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
