On 7 August 2016 at 10:44, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote:
> > Of course the committee has to agree on this. I think we can reach consensus on this within August :) However, more broadly, if a committee has to reach consensus, then there needs to be some method of resolving disagreements within the committee; I assume that will be by voting... and so then, I wonder, does there need to be an odd number of committee members to prevent a hung decision? Or will, for example, Walter providing a tie-breaking decision in such cases? * * * Also, I recalled this thread from a few months ago where Seb and Caryl detailed some of the election history: http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep%40lists.sugarlabs.org/msg16445.html http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep%40lists.sugarlabs.org/msg16467.html http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep%40lists.sugarlabs.org/msg16688.html At the time I made a note on https://wiki.sugarlabs.or g/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Currency_assurance_policy that says, The most recent currency review was in January 2016. >From the thread: AH> Sebastian, do you recall how many emails bounced by Dec 15th 2015 AH> when you verified 79 active members > SS> Of the ~262(+/-) emails sent, 50 bounced. Identifying them will take SS> some processing. Seb, did you do this processing? If not, perhaps better to forget it. I think as Caryl said in the thread, CB> we need to go back to "square 1" on the active members list :)
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep