We have supported Sugar Network on a voluntary basis without retribution since it's deployment on 2014. Unfortunately we ran out of resources and can't afford to dedicate the required time.
Regards Laura 2017-04-08 9:24 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>: > This document helps clarify what work needs to be done. What is not clear > to me is why this is work that needs to be funded as opposed to being done > by volunteers. > > -walter > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> As per SLOB's request in yesterday's meeting, I'm attaching the Sugar >> Network urgent maintenance project proposal. >> >> I hope this documents covers all the information required by SLOB's to >> make a decision. >> >> >> Regards from the Peruvian Amazon forest, >> >> Laura >> >> >> >> 2017-04-02 23:58 GMT-05:00 Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>: >> >>> Dear Community members, Oversight Board Members and Free Software >>> Conservancy Staff, >>> >>> >>> I would like to add the following request to the upcoming April's Sugar >>> Labs Oversight Board meeting: >>> >>> >>> >>> Our dear *Sugar Network is in #urgent need of maintenance*. >>> >>> Due the the recurrent *spam attacks *we have had during previous >>> months, and due to the fact that we are serving a large group of active >>> users during the local school year, I'm hereby requesting funds to perform >>> the following technical services: >>> >>> >>> - The addition of a "Captcha" identifier for the 3 main forms. >>> - Clean the Spam comments >>> >>> Active users this could help: +40,000 >>> Name of who is actually doing the work: Luis Sebastian Silva, Laura >>> Victoria Vargas >>> Funds required: USD $500 >>> >>> >>> I openly declare the existence of conflict of interest associated with >>> any funding request presented by me and/or my husband as long as I continue >>> serving as a Sugar Labs Oversight Board member. >>> >>> Notwithstanding the above, I understand Conservancy acknowledges that >>> many PLC (Project Leadership Committee) Persons are technical service >>> contractors and therefore it would be doable for the Sugar Labs Oversight >>> Board to approve the required funds. >>> >>> According to the Software Freedom Conservancy Conflict of Interest >>> Policy, a conflicted PLC Person must abstain from and must not hear nor >>> read the pre-vote discussions of the matter. >>> >>> Therefore* I will not vote nor participate in any pre-vote discussions >>> of this matter.* >>> >>> >>> Blessings and thanks in advance! >>> >>> >>> Attachment 1: Artwork shared at Sugar Network - English Class Prof. Hilda >>> Attachment 2: Official Conflict of Interest Policy of Conservancy >>> Attachment 3: Spam Comments on Sugar Network >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Laura V. >>> * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* >>> >>> “No paradox, no progress.” >>> ~ Niels Bohr >>> >>> Happy Learning! >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Laura V. >> * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* >> >> “No paradox, no progress.” >> ~ Niels Bohr >> >> Happy Learning! >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SLOBs mailing list >> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs >> >> > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > <http://www.sugarlabs.org> > -- Laura V. * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* “No paradox, no progress.” ~ Niels Bohr Happy Learning!
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep