+1 James, my thought exactly about sharing the URL to any mailing list. It should be on demand!!
Just a thought. On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:53 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > G'day Adam, > > I've a degree in business, which included accounting, and have > recently completed extra training on governance, so I'll comment on > what I've seen; in context below; > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 05:03:06PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote: > > 1) Detailed Sugar Labs financial info is provided for the entirety > > of 2016 and 2017-to-date below. > > Interesting, thanks. I've no issues with the numbers or transactions. > > > The entirety of Sugar Labs financial info is almost 1/3 of gigabyte > > as checked out from SFC, > > Quite a small data set, at only 333 MB. > > > so more details can be obtained later this year should finer details > > be truly necessary, with a finer-toothed comb, > > Looking through the meeting minutes, you probably don't need to worry > so much about this; the board members are entitled to full access to > the data, read-only, and are obliged to keep the data as secure as > posssible. > > Yes, it will include private identifiable information (PII) of Sugar > Labs members or other participants. In dealing with Sugar Labs, > people expect the board may see this PII. > > Not every board member will access the data, or have the knowledge to > decode and understand the data. But they are entitled to it. > > Here's what I suggest; > > Don't make it available by posting a URL to any mailing list, not even > slobs@, but instead send it privately to board members who request it, > and include a way for board members to confirm they have the same copy > of the file as other board members. e.g. with a digital signature or > md5sum that you post on the slobs@ mailing list. > > > to de-identify personal home address and very personal account > > numbers therein, which make everyone vulnerable to identify theft. > > No, that is not necessary; as long as the board members know the data > must be kept confidential to the board. > > > Until then, this below provides a very detailed picture of all funds > > received and spent over the past 19 months. > > This and your follow-up messages on this thread could be pulled > together into a single report to the board rather than a series of > messages. It would make your intent clearer. > > A report to community may be different to a report to the board, > containing less identifying information. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep