On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> wrote:
> Walter, > > I guess my question was not clear. My question is about the procedure to > address legal issues to Conservancy. > > The procedure you (SLOB) follow the first time you want to address > Conservancy was to just ask Adam (Sugar Labs rep to SFC) to make a question > to Tony. > > The procedure you (SLOB) follow the second time was to ask SLOBs to > approve an answer t (Sugar Labs rep to SFC) to make a question to Tony. > > I thank in advance to please specify, why do you follow two different > procedures for the same process? > Quite simply, in the second exchange, Tony asked for the oversight board to give their opinion. Since it was not apparent that we had consensus, I used the motion mechanism to confirm that we had a majority agreeing to our answer to his question. In both cases, I asked Adam, our liaison, to handle the communication with Tony. > > Regards, > > Laura > > 2017-09-15 15:59 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>: > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Walter, Adam, >>> >>> Am confused here. Why did we not need a motion to make the question to >>> Tony in the first place? >>> >>> Can you please clarify. >>> >> >> Tony asked for the opinion of the oversight board to several questions. I >> posted those questions several days ago and while a discussion ensued, no >> one (except me) actually answered the questions. I chose to make a motion >> in order to focus on the questions that Tony had posed and to move things >> along since there are several members of the community who have said that >> this issue is urgent. >> >>> >>> Procedure Note: In my opinion such legal related motions should be >>> translated to Sugar Labs main users language: Spanish. This takes time but >>> needs to be done so that real Sugar users can understand what the Oversight >>> is requesting. >>> >> >> We certainly can discuss this. We'd need some mechanism to execute it. >> >> regards. >> >> -walter >> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> 2017-09-15 15:26 GMT-05:00 Martin Dengler <mar...@martindengler.com>: >>> >>>> >>>> > On 15 Sep 2017, at 14:13, Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > +1 for the motion. >>>> > >>>> > @Martin, thanks to wait for all votes or at least the end of voting >>>> delay. >>>> >>>> Sure Lionel - what is the voting delay? I actually was waiting but the >>>> wiki had been updated already (not by me) so I figured as the wiki had been >>>> updated and the outcome was not in doubt it was ok to summarize it in an >>>> email. I agree the delay should govern in the future. >>>> >>>> > Lionel. >>>> >>>> Martin >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SLOBs mailing list >>>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org >>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Laura V. >>> * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* >>> >>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” >>> ~ L. Victoria >>> >>> Happy Learning! >>> #LearningByDoing >>> #Projects4good >>> #IDesignATSugarLabs >>> #WeCanDoBetter >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Walter Bender >> Sugar Labs >> http://www.sugarlabs.org >> <http://www.sugarlabs.org> >> > > > > -- > Laura V. > * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* > > “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” > ~ L. Victoria > > Happy Learning! > #LearningByDoing > #Projects4good > #IDesignATSugarLabs > #WeCanDoBetter > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep