Thank you Richard for sharing your comment. To all colleagues, FYI, all comments to the ICANN Accountability second draft proposal are posted at : http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/
Izumi On 2015/09/11 14:45, Richard Hill wrote: > Please see inline below. > > Thanks and best, > Richard > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Izumi Okutani >> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 01:41 >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: [IANAxfer@apnic] CCWG ICANN Accountabilitysecond draft report >> -- numbers related analysis [9/12 comment deadline] >> > > SNIP > >> >> 6. Community Mechanism as Sole Member Model >> >> The first Draft Report suggested that these powers would be exercised >> by changing ICANN's structure into a membership-based organisation, >> with the SO/ACs as the members (Membership Model). An alternative model >> was also investigated, whereby the SO/ACs would become designators >> (Designator Model). >> >> During the public consultation and thereafter, objections were >> expressed to both of these models. As a result of further discussions >> and consultations, the second Draft Report introduces a new structure >> called the Sole Membership Model. >> > > SNIP >> >> Do you have any comments with regard to this model? > > Yes, see: > > > http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00002.h > tml > >> >> Thank you, >> >> Izumi Okutani >> ASO representative for ICANN Accoutability CCWG >> _______________________________________________ >> IANAxfer mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer > _______________________________________________ IANAxfer mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
