We might considering using a three part tag, such as core_1_5_0, for major/minor/milestone.
-Ted. On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:14:23 +0100, gilles bayon wrote: >�I have changing the structure of the SVN repo for .NET tho follow >�the final structure that will be used in Apache SVN. >�Also, the new structure is the a the structure that each SVN repo >�must follow. The move to Apache SVN is in preparation. No firmer >�date is envisaged as I know. > >�In SVN each release correpond to a tag (and will be in the tag >�repo). > >�The DataAccess version will be 1.5 because of new features and >�refactoring of the core. The DataMapper version will be 1.1, just >�bug fixes/ and minor bew features (type attribut on resultMap, >�parameterMap) to better work with provider as OracleClient. The >�next version of DataMapper will be 1.5 as it must be included an >�entire refactoring of parametermMap handling and support for Custom >�type handlers ... ��The DocBook-based Data Mapper/Data Access Guide >�are now split in multiple files to help maintenance and are >�specialized for .NET as .NET version of iBATIS is not at the same >�level of developpement as Java version. >�In future version, the merge will be re-considered. EyeBrowse : >�don't know. ��Cheers -Gilles > > >�Hi.��I noticed that the WUSH.NET repository is changing structure.� > >�Is this in prep to move the repository to Apache with iBATIS for >�Java also in Subversion?��Is there a firmer date for this move? > >�How will the branching work (will there actually be branches)?��I >�seem to recall reading that iBATIS for Java was going for a release >�schedule like: .0 new features ->�.1 bug fixes ->�.2 new features - >�>�.3 bug fixes etc (or maybe I made that up or mixed it up with my >�projects at work!��LOL).��Is iBATIS.NET also headed for the same >�release pattern? > >�How is the documentation update for Java going to be handled?��I >�know that the DocBook-based Data Mapper Guide for .NET is now split >�up into various chapter files, but there is .NET-specific content >�in the �common� files, such as in examples and explanatory text.� >�Are the Java and .NET docs really going to share the same �common� >�files with the Developer Guide chapters being more specific > >�Is EyeBrowse still in the works for the email list archives?��I do >�use mail-archive.com right now. > >�Thanks! > >�Roberto > > >�Acc�dez au courrier �lectronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; >�3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34 /mn) ; t�l : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34/mn)
