OK, how about Sunday, 16 Jan 2005, at 23:59 PST, then? After giving SourceForge a day to catch up, we could submit the repositories on Tuesday.
-T. On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:10:07 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote: >�The only thing I don't like about that is that it takes away the >�entire weekend for development. �Could we freeze monday? �Or >�perhaps the weekend is the best time for the infrastructure team to >�do the import? > >�Cheers, >�Clinton > > >�On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:28:17 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >�wrote: > >>�WUSH.NET also does a nightly dump. It might be best if we froze >>�the subversion repository at the same time, so that they were >>�both available to infrastructure. >> >>�I never got an answer about which one it was better to do first, >>�so we can let whoever does it decide. >> >>�Did we want to pick a time, then? It would be helpful if we were >>�definite in the board report as to when we are moving forward. >> >>�How about, say, Friday 14-Jan-2005 at 23:59 Pacific Standard Time? >> >>�We'd then be able to submit it to infrastructure by Monday. >> >>�Of course, people can still continue to work offline and then >>�synch up with the repository. We would just have to be more >>�careful about coordinating work for a few days so as to avoid >>�conflicts. >> >>�-Ted. >> >> >>�On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote: >> >>>�Hi Ted, >>> >>>�Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. �To date we've never had a >>>�2- phase release. �We'll start that as of the next release. >>> >>>�As for the date, we could move any time. However we do it, >>>�we'll need >>>�to wait about 24 hours after the last commit to allow time for >>>�SF.net >>>�to create the nightly tarball of the repository. �I'll put a >>>�tracer file in as the last commit, to ensure that the tarball >>>�contains all of the latest changes. �When the time comes, I'll >>>�remove everyone's access to the SF CVS repository and then >>>�start the 24 hour freeze. >>> >>>�Cheers, >>>�Clinton >>> >>> >>>�On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:44 -0500, Ted Husted >>>�<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>�wrote: >>> >>>>�The quarterly board report is due. >>>> >>>>�Could we set a firm date for the transfer of the CVS and SVN >>>>�repositories? >>>> >>>>�The day the repositories are transferred, we would be able to >>>>�apply for graduation. >>>> >>>>�The vote for the MyFaces graduation is pending now. It would >>>>�be nice if we were next. :) >>>> >>>>�-Ted. >>>> >>>>�PS - Is iBATIS 2.0.9 considered a "General Availability" >>>>�release? >>>> >>>>�--- Original Message --- >>>>�From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>�To: <[email protected]> >>>>�Cc: >>>>�Sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:04:40 -0500 >>>>�Subject: *** QUARTERLY STATUS REPORTS *** >>>> >>>>>�The Incubator's Quarterly Report is due next week. �All >>>>>�projects should e-mail a brief status report (and make sure >>>>>�that their STATUS file is up to date) by the weekend. >>>>> >>>>>�Mentors, you don't have to do the report yourself, but >>>>>�please do make sure that it gets done. �:-) >>>>> >>>>>�Anyone should feel free to reply with any items that you >>>>>�feel are >>>>>�going well with the Incubator, or could be improved to make >>>>>�the Incubator work better. >>>>> >>>>>�--- Noel
