> -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoy=E9=A0: dimanche 16 janvier 2005 21:48 > =C0=A0: [email protected] > Objet=A0: RE: .NET SVN migration >=20 > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:35:12 +0100, Gilles Bayon wrote: > >=A0I think source is more appropriate then Mapper. >=20 > I'm was just trying to minimize change, Gilles. >=20 > AFAIK, we don't want to keep both the DataMapper and DataAccess = solutions > in the same folder indefinitely. The layout we've been circulating has = one > folder for DataMapper and another for DataAccess. >=20 > ---- >=20 > /branches (as required) > /tags > */java > **/releases > ***/2.1.0 > */cs > **/releases > ***/1.5.0 > /trunk > */site > */cs > **/mapper <-- DataMapper > **/dao <-- DataAccess > **/docs > **/npetshop > **/tutorial > */java > **/mapper > **/dao > **/docs > **/jpetstore >=20 > ----
Do we forgot the Common project in the layout ? **/common **/mapper **/dao **/docs >=20 > I'm just not sure of the state of the DataAccess versus DataMapper > solutions. >=20 > I don't use the DataAccess subproject myself, and I'm reluctant to = touch > it. >=20 > If they can live in separate folder now, then lets move the = DataAccess.sln > and related resources to "/trunk/cs/dao" >=20 > If they need to stay together for now, I'd suggest that we keep them = both > under "mapper", so that we only have to move one again later. They can live in separate folder but if we do that, I must change the reference to other projects in the DataAccess solution. So for now let's keep thing like that. -Gilles=20 --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005 =20
