But there aren't other columns for those properties. Let me explain...
Here is some test code. T_user and t_issue are tables in a database.
Below that are 2 java files. This is pseudo code and outlook keeps
correctly cap mistakes so don't poke fun at the bad syntax. :)
t_user
------
User_id
First_name
Last_name
T_issue
--------
Issue_id
User_id
Issue.java
----------
Public class Issue
{
Private int issueId;
Private User user;
//getters and setters
}
User.java
-----------
Public class User
{
Private int userId;
Private int firstName;
Private int lastName;
//getters and setters
}
When I query for an Issue and return an Issue.java object, I need User
to be populated with the appropriate user for that issue. Does that
make more sense?
Gregg
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Meadors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:08 PM
To: Bolinger, Gregg D
Subject: Re: Mapping Complex Properties (Load all properties)
Well, I would assume you'd map other columns to those properties, but
yeah, you have the idea. :-)
Larry
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:01:04 -0600, Bolinger, Gregg D
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume you mean:
>
> <result property="createdByUser.userId" column="creating_user_id" />
>
> Well, would I map my other properties lke
>
> <result property="createdByUser.firstName" column="creating_user_id"
/>
> <result property="createdByUser.lastName" column="creating_user_id" />
