Looosly typed!
That's not loose typing. It's NO typing.
The type that's missing isn't what you think it is. The type that's missing is your domain class definition. You don't have types at all. You just have collections of implicitly related information.
In any case, I appreciate your heavy, thorough testing of our Map support (seriously actually). ;-)
Cheers, Clinton
Now that you guys have concluded that map usage is not desirable ( I totally agree), is there any chance of answering my original question about the flexible resultmaps ?
Thanks.
Huy
