On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 15:49 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:39:01PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > + * Check whether we have really a graphics device physically
> > + * in the slot and registered at the system.
> > + */
> > + dev = acpi_get_physical_device(device->handle);
> > + if (!dev) {
> > + printk (KERN_DEBUG PREFIX "Video device %s.%s not physically"
> > + " connected, ignoring\n", acpi_device_bid(device),
> > + device->parent ? acpi_device_bid(device->parent) : "");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
>
> I suspect this will break other machines. Not all video extension
> implementations are directly associated with the PCI ID. The Toshiba
> M200 (for example) has
>
> Device (PCI1)
> {
> Name (_ADR, 0x00010000)
> Device (VGA)
> {
> Name (_ADR, 0x00)
>
> which will result in VGA not having a physical device. You might be able
> to get away with walking the parents until you find a pci ID and then
> checking whether it matches the graphics adaptor, but I'm not certain of
> that.
You mean like I did in my previous approach?
> To make things more entertaining, Dell tend to implement a video
> extension for both the 00:02.0 and 00:02.1 devices on Intel systems. We
> need to be smarter about this, but I don't think simply looking for a
> physical device is the solution.
Li, could you help here, pls.
I don't know enough about different possible PCI setups...
Thanks,
Thomas
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
