On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:28:51PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> OK, if you want to give a try to my test case:
>
> $ [install darcs]
> $ darcs get
> http://alioth.debian.org/~gismo/darcs-pull-bug/parenscript.upstream/
> $ darcs get http://alioth.debian.org/~gismo/darcs-pull-bug/parenscript/
> $ cd parenscript
> $ darcs pull ../parenscript.upstream/
> [choose to apply only the first patch]
>
> At that point, darcs takes 100% of the CPU and temperature starts to
> rise :-(
Hmm.... darcs is not impressing me as a good choice of version control
systems. I mean, yes I'm spoiled with git being able to merge
hundreds of patches is seconds, but this is rediculous! :-)
I've tried running for it for a while, and THM0 and THM1 are in the
80-83 degree range, but it's not going above that. According to THM1
has a passive trip point at 96 degrees, and a critical trip point at
100 degrees, but with your test case I'm not going anywhere near that
level.
Just for yucks I tried running a second copy of your test case (since
I hae a dual-core processor), and with the second core also busy 100%,
I was able to drive the temperature up another degree or two, but that
was about it.
Regards,
- Ted
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
