Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > >> So what is the status here, how should we proceed? >> This isn't applied to any tree yet? >> IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue them on >> the test branch and keep it a while there. > > I posted them, got a small amount of feedback and no further acks. I can > push them again.
The problem seems to be that some people report this as a regression. So either: - It's not actually an regression but has always been this way. In this case it's fine to delay. - It's an regression. Then something must have been changed. Do we know what that is? If it's really an regression then we need a low-risk fix for .27. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
