On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:54:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:22:02 +0400 > Artem Savkov <artem.sav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > set_freezable() checks freezing during which no locks should be held. > > hotkey_thread_mutex lock should be moved closer to where it is actually > > needed. > > > > Thanks. > > When fixing a bug, we always like to see a full description of that bug > so we can better work out which kernel versions need the fix. Sorry, will do thah in future.
> Did you actually hit a lockup because of this? Or was it just from > code inspection? Or ... ? I didn't hit an actual lockup, but I did hit a warning during boot. The warning was added by "lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time" patch (2f2ff7b8979c50491b3cbce622d7bea4d44a8682 in linux-next.git) -- Kind regards, Artem ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
