>In the process of reviewing out LLA libraries it was discovered that >some libraries were not in LLA. I made the request to out "outsourcer" >to add these datasets. Their response was that they are PDSEs and there >is no advantage to adding PDSEs to LLA, even with the "FREEZE" option. >Not that I think they would lie, but are the accurate? If what they say >is true, is it more efficient to use a PDS and put it in LLA or leave it >as a PDSE? Being "old school" I think the former is the better choice. >Does anyone else have an opinion?
There is a new Redbooks Technote related to the above question at http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0567.html : "Partitioned Data Set Extended (PDSE) Hiperspace (Caching) Problems, Considerations, and Parameter Changes" Peter Hunkeler Senior IT Specialist, IBM zSeries Technical Sales Support, Switzerland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
