In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/12/2005
at 08:38 PM, "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I don't understand your point. All of the time that elapses while a
>given TCB is dispatched is charged to that TCB.
The issue is time that elapses while the TCB is *not* dispatched, but
the CAS is performing work on behalf of a request issued by that TCB.
>The addressing mode and current values of PASN and SASN are
>completely irrelevant.
Isn't that what I repeatedly said?
>If PASN<>HASN, then by definition you are executing "IN" another
>address space
That's your definition, not mine, which is why I wrote "I guess that
we will have to agree to disagree". I would consider that to simply be
cross-memory.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
