Agreed. What it *does* say, though, is the answer to the question originally raised about not being able to define arbitrary areas of memory as programs. There's no *documented* way to do it, which for those of us who are not now or never were aware of the "other" PLIST for the IDENTIFY SVC (i.e., me, among others) says that it cannot be done.
Also agreed, that is an *implied* conclusion of which you and others (thanks also to Alex B. and GSF, inter alia) have disabused us all. One more example of what happens when one assumes. Mea culpa. 'Nuff said. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 4:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDENTIFY restriction [was: RE: ISKE/IVSK] In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/29/2005 at 09:49 AM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A931/5.1 >?SHELF=IEA2BK34&DT=20030429143021&CASE= I don't see no stinking memo. What I see is essetially the same text that was there all the way back to OS/360, describing the form of IDENTIFY used to create a minor CDE. It doesn't say that the form of IDENTIFY used to create a major CDE has been withdrawn or even changed. _ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html