Seeing as the dataset is opened, wouldn't there be a type 42-6 record for it that is not just using the relative concat id?
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 4:29 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: HSM statistics > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on 06/30/2005 > at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >To get the data into SMF, you would first have to change JES. > > Why? How do you believe that it is involved in the collection of the > data? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
