Seeing as the dataset is opened, wouldn't there be a type 42-6 record for it
that is not just using the relative concat id?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 4:29 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM statistics
> 
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> on 06/30/2005
>    at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> >To get the data into SMF, you would first have to change JES.
> 
> Why? How do you believe that it is involved in the collection of the
> data?
> 
> --
>      Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>      ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
> (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to