In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/29/2005
at 11:30 AM, "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>The JES projects at share definitely "get along".
And have for decades. That comes in handy when IBM plays pass the buck
("That's not a TSO problem, it's a JES problem. That's not a JES
problem, it's a TSO problem. The JES2 requirement is rejected because
it would affect JES3. The JES3 requirement is rejected because it
would affect JES2."
The above quotation is purely imaginary and was in no way inspired by
a joint requirement that some of you may recall ;-)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
