This link probably won't fit on one line, but it's an excellent article IMHO:
http://www.eservercomputing.com/ME2/Audiences/dirmod.asp?sid=BCF4DE820EA64A858FB46EECB7C00BB4&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&AudID=174DB902288C4970A30C71C9427313A7&tier=4&id=64AE6EE59AA34C67B2A5CD23CE07D1D3 I guess you could say, without exaggeration, that the cost to (the company mentioned) of *not* having mainframe QoS is $2.75+ billion. (It's public knowledge that they didn't have a mainframe.) Or, more precisely, the odds of a $2.75+ billion loss would have been a whole lot lower, one would think. - - - - - Timothy F. Sipples Consulting Enterprise Software Architect IBM Americas zSeries/z9 Software NEW Phone: +1 312 529 1612 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP key available.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
