Thanks, Sam. I have run the Health Checker. One of the exceptions it detects is having PATHOUTs defined without an associated CLASS definition. As explained in my first posting, we have 3 CLASSDEFs with GROUP(UNDESIG) defined. In the RMF XCF activity report I can see requests delivered in all transport classes, not only in the default class. Since this is the case, why is it recommended (in IBM literature and by the Health Checker) to associate a CLASS with each PATHOUT definition? And why is it that I can see requests delived in all transport classes even though none of them are defined explicitly to a PATHOUT? Thanks, Gil.
On 9/5/05, Knutson, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Gil, > > I would suggest you install and run the IBM Health Checker. Don't wait for > the new and improved Health Checker go install and run the existing one > now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
