Unless the catalog has a PDSE indicator and you use the same catalog for both IPL's, how would anyone know of this "inconsistency"?
"Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi, All, I'm getting ready to SMP/E-install a new version of a product, and this new version delivers the load library in a PDSE (earlier version is PDS). The target load library will live on extended SYSRES with a SYS1 hlq, and will be indirectly cataloged. Does anybody see any "issue" with having a PDS or a PDSE "active" for the same DSN, depending on which RES set is IPLed? IOW, say RESA has the "old" SYS1.PRODUCT.LOADLIB as a PDS and RESB has the "new" one as a PDSE. Any "issue" with simply IPLing from one RES or the other? TIA, -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html --------------------------------- Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
