On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:24:43 -0500, Mark Zelden <mark.zel...@zurichna.com> wrote:
>>Are there any other issues or impacts to changing this? >> > >One word. SAF. > >If you have SAF rules set up for SDSF, then changing is probably easy and >provides functionality. If you don't (you use ISFPARMS / ISFPRMxx) then >this could break something that may be working today. > <snip> Or worse, if you have the RACF classes inactive or don' have the permissions set up properly, you could allow someone to get at anything in your spool to retrieve or delete. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
