It's no big deal, of course, but now that I think about it, you are probably right. I don't think we encountered the problem in our testing, because we didn't have a 64-bit machine yet, so one of our ESP customers ran into it first. It was a pretty easy fix - as soon as I looked at the code I knew what was wrong, and all I had to do was delete a large chuck of code and replace it with a PGSER. Then I had to make the same change to about 3 other products that had used the same code.
>>> Mark Zelden <mark.zel...@zurichna.com> 9/17/2009 12:23 PM >>> It was a 64-bit related change. Do I have a OS/390 2.10 system around to prove it? No. Can I point you to doc? No... but there is probably something in the archives. There should be another developer on the list that can confirm someone from IBM. Mark CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this material in error and that any forwarding, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of the material is strictly prohibited. If you have received this material in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the material. Emails are not secure and can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by email. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
