> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Sam Siegel
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 3:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was
Re:
> Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic instructions?
> 
> IBM needs to keep optimizing the c/c++ compiler to support
*nix/windows
> server consolidation onto zLinux.

But doesn't z/Linux require the use of gcc for the C/C++ compiler?  That
would be a different engine than the c89 (or whatever it's called)
compiler on z/OS Unix Services, wouldn't it?

Peter


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of 
the 
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to