On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:09:36 -0500, Luc Martens (KBC) <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi guys, >we recently had some incidents which caused us a lot of debugging before we >noticed what was going one. >Some JES2 parmlib definitions did not correspond with the actual state of the >definitions in JES2. >I'm wondering if someone has had already the same problem, and is having an >automated way to check for differences between parmlib and actual jes2 defs >(which have been dynamically changed). >We are thinking on querying all jes2 defs, and checking then with defs in >parmlib. Should someone has already written this and willing to share, that >would be very much appreciated. >Any other ideas are also welcome. >Regards, Luc. How often are they changing and why? Many shops (including us) use dynamic proclib definitions, but don't routinely change them. Or is this just needed as a "one and done" action from a problem postmortem? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[email protected] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
