On 21 Oct 2009 16:35:23 -0700, eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com (Eric Bielefeld)
wrote:

>I never saw the point in standing in front of a machine, putting in my money, 
>pushing the button, and watching my money disappear.  I think I was in a 
>casino twice.  
>Once to get a meal, and once because there was a job fair there.  They didn't 
>get 
>any of my money except for the meal.

Different strokes.   I'm with you, but gambling is a very popular pass
time, whether it's pure gambling, or fool oneself into thinking I'm
smart enough to win gambling.    But if someone treats it like
entertainment - spending $50 for a night out, nobody's hurt.

Others can't play golf without making a bet, even if the money is
small enough to be meaningless.   I don't "get" it.   Maybe I'm cheap.
Not being a gambler means I can't get good competition for poker, and
I don't get the advantage of doubling dice in backgammon - but since
everybody has different values on a $5 bet, gambling automatically
puts us on an uneven competition.

So what does this mean about betting on jobs, on careers, on new
computer systems?    It means I'm chicken.   I go with the tried and
true.    I don't risk my money, and I don't risk my employers money.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to