Putting the onus of strong passwords on the user did not work, so why
should any other policy? 

Overly restrictive password rules do not add strength.  

My $0.02. 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Perryman, Brian
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PCI audit compliance

A valid and good point. However I suspect that they will just point out
that their policy clearly states that passwords should not be written
down, and shift the blame to the user. 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: 06 October 2005 14:37
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PCI audit compliance


Have you discussed with them the risk that the users will write down
their passwords if they are too difficult to remember? Perhaps the
solution is to use authentication techniques that are more robust than
passwords.
  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to