"Terri E Shaffer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<fc9f7dcfec3d424cac2eb55114f0afa31b2e7d9...@emarc03vs01.exchad.jpmc
hase.net>...
> We currently have 3- 3330cyl page datasets defined per 3390-9 volumes
with PAV support turned on. My question revolves around the above
support and might be more of a personal opinion than technical one....
So is it better performance to allocate 1 per volume, 3 per volume per
3390-9 and/or what if I go for a full Mod-27 or even mod-54, given
either 1 or multiple per physical volumes???  Is anyone doing this
currently since the APAR closed last year?  Have you seen any
performance hits/ benefits.. etc??  
> 
> Since my history dates what I was always taught and given
controllers/cache/pav's etc, what are others seeing?   
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ms. Terri E. Shaffer 

One consideration I can thing of is PAV. 
ASM ensures 2 exposures for each pagedataset. As far as I know, nothing
has changed there, so with full mod-27's or -54's you still have 2
exposures on a much large pagedataset and much more ASM slots. 
I don't know how hyperpav solves this on hyperpav capable devices, but
on ESS, you might want to use smaller pagedatasets to have enough
exposures over your ASM slots.

Kees.
**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
registered number 33014286 
**********************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to