On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:20:25 -0600, McKown, John <john.mck...@healthmarkets.com> wrote:
> >I see why it is not, technically, 64 bit storage. It's 32-bit storage. >But the program must be AMODE(64) in order to address it. right? I suppose (along with the supporting code / PTFs / bit in the RCE set). >And you likely could __NOT__ use it for parms to be passed to other programs or system services, even in AMODE(64). Hum, to me, for me, fairly useless. > This is where some doc on the clever usage of this storage from Java would come in handy. Speaking of Java... and my last post about this. Maybe it was a special test version of Java 64-bit and the support isn't there yet? I did a quick search and came up empty. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
