On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Mark Zelden <mark.zel...@zurichna.com> wrote:
> There is no good reason to have wrong or obsolete information.  But
> I can think of one good reason to not have the release information and
> OS compatibility information on your web site.    That type of information
> could be considered a form of "support" and you might want to make sure
> the client that needs that support / information is paying their bills
> before giving it to them.   Most ISVs may not care, but if I were running
> my own small software company, I might.  Especially if my software didn't
> necessarily break with OS upgrades or I didn't have expiration date
> type of licensing built into the software.
>
> One vendor I deal with now requires a contract number before opening
> any support issues.   I don't like it.   Those of us in the trenches don't
> deal with contracts and contract numbers change when renewals come
> up.  I can't imagine why the first level support or person opening the
> ticket can't just look up my company's name and determine that we
> are paying our bills and deserve the support.  I guess they are worried
> that I may not be from the company I say I am from.

This is an excellent point. While making it painful for Joe or Jane
Sysprog is obviously bad, there's some value in encouraging a quick
contact at release boundaries, if only to avoid the "What? We're five
releases backlevel?" surprise. The trick is to find the happy medium,
as usual...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to