On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:21:02 -0600, Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote:
>Good point, but if they are all named uniquely, why would you need >indirect cataloging at all? (isn't that how everyone does it today)? >How would the new support enhance what you have today? Precisely! Spot on, as usual. I see no benefit in it. Zero. Sounds more like someone in ICF development needed to keep busy. Not only would MOUNT require VOLSER support, but so would automount. We automount-manage our /service directory due to our numerous SYSRES pairs, and this is the ONLY way we have found to ensure the correct version HFS' are mounted. Considering the lengthy, nigh futile, discussions we had with L2/L3 on automount and /service, I doubt such support will be readily available and reliable. I see no reason, barring IBM forcing the zFS conversion to an insane end, to convert my version HFS'. We finally sorted through the last Java repackaging. It works, it's fine, please just leave it be. Regards, Art Gutowski Ford Motor Company ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
