> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:29 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: PDS vs. PDSE
> 
> On 10 Feb 2010 12:09:58 -0800, hmerr...@jackhenry.com (Hal Merritt)
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >PDSE's are very useful, as are PDS's. If you don't need the 
> PDSE features then why bother? You don't see many compelling 
> business/technical cases to convert PDS's to PDSE's. 
> >
> >My $0.02
> 
> Other computers didn't need the advantages of PDS's.   Nor the
> disadvantages.   

Does anything other than S/360 derived systems even use CKD type DASD? PDS 
directories are built around CKD. And, in their day, moving the search logic 
out to the peripheral was probably a good idea.

--
John McKown 
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to